Three Models for Reconstructing the
Settlement of Israel in Canaan
by Lien-yueh Wei
|
The Conquest Modal |
The Immigration Model |
The social Revolution Modal |
Representative
|
(Fundamentalist) |
Alt |
Mendenhall |
Date |
|
1920s |
1960s |
Principle |
The narrative of the conquest and
settlement in the book of Joshua |
Form Criticism (social context) |
Sociological and Anthropological
methods |
Interpretation |
The conquest of Israel in Canaan is
a real event in Canaanite history |
As the nomads, Israelites gradually
move into the Canaan where had not too many people and beyond the control of
Canaanite city-state at that time |
The conquest of Israel in Canaan is
a peasants’ (social) revolution |
Reason |
As the narrative of the book of
Joshua |
The conquest of Israel in Canaan is
an etiological legend. The purpose of this legend is to offer a theological
explanation for a given situation. |
1) Israelites were the same ethnicity to the Canaanites;
they were not the new outside comers.
2)Israelites were agricultural
society
3)the peasants’ (social) revolution is to oppose the
system of tax, military, or labor conducted by Canaanite city-state |
Archeological evidence |
Cannot confirm the historicity of
the conquest
Ex: the destruction layer cannot be
date to the end of the Late Bronze Age or the beginning of the Iron Age (ca.
1200 B.C.E.) |
Cannot support the Israelites as
nomads
Ex: Israelites were agricultural
society; nomadic form is subtype of livelihood. |
Support the Israelites as peasants
and residents, and agricultural society at that time |
Bibliography
Berlin, Adele & Brettler, Marc Zvi,
The Jewish Study Bible,
(NY: Oxford University Express, 2004)
Frick, Frank S., A Journey through
the Hebrew Scriptures,
(CA: Thomson Learning, 2003).
|