|     
Different Interpretations of Christology 
by Simon Lien-yueh Wei 
			
			  
  
    | 
     
	C.E  | 
    
     
	Representative  | 
    
     
	Designation  | 
    
     
	Divine 
	 
    
	nature  | 
    
     
	Human 
    
	nature  | 
    
     
	Nature  | 
    
     
	Person  | 
    
     
	Hypo- 
    
	stasis  | 
    
     
	Interpretation  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	1  | 
    
     
	Apostles  | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	A person was indivisible one, fully 
    divine and fully human.  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	1  | 
    
     
	Gnosticism 
    
	Marcionism  | 
    
     
	Docetism  | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	0  | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	Divine cannot suffer. The matter was 
    impurity.  
    
	Hence, Christ’s manhood and his 
    suffering were unreal and phantasmal.  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	2  | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	
	Ebionism 
    
	
	or 
    Ebionites  | 
    
     
	0  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	
	They deny 
    the divine nature in Christ. Christ is a complete human. 
    
	
	Ebionism 
    was also called “The denomination of Poor”  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	2  | 
    
     
	Irenaeus 
	  | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	Christ is the unity of God-man, 
    fully divine and fully human..  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	3  | 
    
     
	Tertullian  | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	2  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	2  | 
    
     
    
    1 two natures or two substances 
    in Christ, not confused but conjoined. Each of them preserves its peculiar 
    qualities.   
    
	
	2 The 
    divine spirit mingles God and man in Christ.
     
    
	3 The Word governs Christ’s 
    humanity. 
    
	4 Christ’s humanity was genuine and 
    complete, including soul and body. 
    
	5 Christ’s humanity can suffer and 
    die. Christ’s divinity cannot suffer and die. 
    
    
    6 After resurrection, Jesus preserve the substance and 
    form of human flesh in heaven.  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	4  | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	Arians 
    
	(Alexandria) 
    
	
    non-orthodox  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	0  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
    
    1 A “Word-Flesh” type of Christology--incomplete 
    humanity 
    
	(The 
    Word is not fully divine, is a creature, and is changeable.) 
    
	2 God became flesh, not became a 
    man.  
    
	3 One nature, divine nature, in 
    Christ. 
    
	4 Christ was not a complete man, 
    lacking a human soul.  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	4  | 
    
     
    
    Athanasius  | 
    
     
	(Alexandria) 
    
	orthodox 
    
	   | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	1 A “Word-Flesh” type of Christology 
    
	 (The 
    Word is fully divine, and is unchangeable in Christ) 
    
	2 The Word became flesh 
    
	3 One and same Person. 
    
	4 The Word governs Christ’s humanity  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	4  | 
    
     
	Eustathius 
    
	   | 
    
     
	(Antiochene)  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	2  | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	1 A “Word-man” type of Christology--complete 
    humanity 
    
	2 God became a man 
    
	3 Two nature in Christ 
    
	4 The Word dwell in humanity  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	4  | 
    
     
	Apollinarius  | 
    
     
	Apollinari- 
    
	anism 
    
	(Alexandria) 
    
	  
    
	   | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	0  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
	1 A “Word-Flesh” type of 
    Christology. Monophysite,  
    
	2 Christ was God’s incarnation. 
    God’s spirit united with fresh in one nature. 
    
    
    3 There is one nature, the divine nature in Christ. 
    Christ is a single, undivided Person. 
    
	4 This one nature composed of 
    impassible divinity and passible flesh. 
    
	5 There is no human nature in 
    Christ. 
    
    
    6 Christ did not have human mind or soul so that
    there were not two contradictory wills in Christ 
    
    
    7 The Word is fully divine is unchangeable in Christ so 
    that there were no sin in Christ 
    
	*This theory was condemned as heresy 
    because:  
    
    
    1. Docetism: Christ 
    is not a complete human  
	 
    
	2. If Christ was not a complete 
    human, He could not save humans  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	4-5  | 
    
     
	Diodore of Tarsus  | 
    
     
	(Antiochene) 
    
	Nestorian  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	2  | 
    
     
	2  | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
    
    1 If the Word unites with the fresh, the divinity will be 
    compromised by humanity. 
    
	2 Therefore, he opposes the unity of 
    divinity and humanity. 
    
	3 Two natures and two Persons in 
    Christ. They do not mix or conjoin.  
    
	4 distinguishes the Son of God and 
    the son of David--the theory of Two Sons 
    
	* the theory of Two Sons = 
    Nestorianism  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	4-5  | 
    
     
	
	Theodore 
    and 
    Nestorius  | 
    
     
	(Antiochene)  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	2  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	1 A “Word-man” type of Christology 
    
	2 The perfect unity of two natures 
    as one Person or one hypostasis in Christ 
    
    
    3 Two nature is united, but not mixed. Each natures is 
    complete and independent.  
    
    * 
    Nestorius was 
    not 
    a Nestorian (Kelly, Ch12, Sec.2, p316)  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	4-5  | 
    
     
	Cyril  | 
    
     
	(Alexandria)  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	1 The Word joins spirit, soul and 
    flesh together in Christ. 
    
    
    2 The divinity unites to the whole of humanity, called 
    the hypostatic union in Christ. 
    
	3 Divinity and humanity united in 
    one nature and one hypostasis 
    
    
    4 Two natures are united closely in Christ. Hence, two 
    natures cannot be distinguished in the union. Each nature is not
    independent. However, they also cannot be confused or mixed. 
    
	5 Christ is simultaneously God and 
    man.  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	5  | 
    
     
	First Council of Ephesus  
    (431)  | 
    
     
	(Antiochene)  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	2  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	   | 
    
     
    
    1 Two natures in Christ. His divinity is 
    consubstantial with the Father. His humanity is consubstantial with us.
     
    
    
    2 Christ is a complete God and complete man composed of a 
    rational soul and a body. 
    
	3 Two natures are unite in 
    one Person, but are not mixed.  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	5  | 
    
     
	Council of Chalcadon  (451)  | 
    
     
	(Antiochene)  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	2  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	1  | 
    
     
	1 Christ is One and is both human 
    and divine 
    
    
    2 His divinity is consubstantial with the Father. His 
    humanity is consubstantial with us. 
    
	3 Two natures in one person and 
    hypostasis 
    
    
    4 the two natures are united without confusion, without 
    change, without division, and without separation 
    
	
	5 
    Chalcedonian decree as a principle of Christology  | 
   
 
  
  
  
Two main 
contrasting Approaches of Christology 
  
  
    | 
     
	Alexandria-heresy: Arians, 
    Apollinarianism   | 
    
     
	Antiochene-heresy: Diodore,
    
    
    
    Nestorian  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	1 “Word-Flesh” type 
    
	1 one nature, divine nature 
    
	2 incomplete humanity in Christ.
     
    
	3 Christ did not have human mind or 
    soul  | 
    
     
	1 Two natures and two Persons in 
    Christ.  
    
	2 They do not mix or conjoin. 
    
     
    
    
    3 distinguishes the Son of God and the son of David--the 
    theory of Two Sons  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	Alexandria: Cyril  | 
    
     
	Antiochene: 
    
    Theodore 
	   | 
   
  
    | 
     
	1 The Word joins spirit, soul and 
    flesh together in Christ. 
    
    
    2 The divinity unites to the whole of humanity, called 
    the hypostatic union in Christ. 
    
	3 Divinity and humanity united in 
    one nature and one hypostasis 
    
    
    4 Two natures are united closely. Hence, two natures 
    cannot be distinguished in the union. Each nature is not 
    independent. However, they also cannot be confused or mixed. 
    
	5 Christ is simultaneously God and 
    man.  
    
	   | 
    
     
	1 “Word-man” type 
    
	2 two natures, divine nature and 
    human nature 
    
	  
    
	3 complete humanity in Christ. 
    Christ has human mind and soul 
    
    
    4 Two natures are united, but not mixed. Hence, two 
    natures can be distinguished in the union. Each nature is complete and 
    independent.  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	Second Council of Ephesus  
    (449) Robber Synod or Brigandage  | 
    
     
	First Council of Ephesus  
    (431) Formula of Christology  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	The case of Eutyches 
    
	One nature 
    in Christ 
    
	Monophysite  | 
    
     
    
    1 Two natures in Christ. His divinity is 
    consubstantial with the Father. His humanity is consubstantial with us.
     
    
    
    2 Christ is a complete God and complete man composed of a 
    rational soul and a body. 
    
	3 Two natures are unite in 
    one Person, but are not mixed. 
    
	   | 
   
  
    | 
     
	   | 
    
     
    
    Council of Chalcedon  (451)  | 
   
  
    | 
     
	   | 
    
     
	1 Christ is One and is both human 
    and divine 
    
    
    2 His divinity is consubstantial with the Father. His 
    humanity is consubstantial with us. 
    
	3 Two natures in one person and 
    hypostasis 
    
    
    4 the two natures are united without confusion, without 
    change, without division, and without separation 
    
    
    5 Chalcedonian decree as a 
    principle of Christology  | 
   
 
  
  
Bibliography 
Kelly, J.N.D., Early Christian 
Doctrines, (NY: Continuum, 1977) 
Ferguson, S. B. & Wright, D. F., 
(editors), New Dictionary of Theology, (London: Leicester, IVP, 1988) 
  
			  
			  
			  
			  
			  
			  
			  
			  
			  
			   |