Different Interpretations of Christology
by Simon Lien-yueh Wei
C.E |
Representative |
Designation |
Divine
nature |
Human
nature |
Nature |
Person |
Hypo-
stasis |
Interpretation |
1 |
Apostles |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
A person was indivisible one, fully
divine and fully human. |
1 |
Gnosticism
Marcionism |
Docetism |
|
0 |
|
|
|
Divine cannot suffer. The matter was
impurity.
Hence, Christ’s manhood and his
suffering were unreal and phantasmal. |
2 |
|
Ebionism
or
Ebionites |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
They deny
the divine nature in Christ. Christ is a complete human.
Ebionism
was also called “The denomination of Poor” |
2 |
Irenaeus
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Christ is the unity of God-man,
fully divine and fully human.. |
3 |
Tertullian |
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 two natures or two substances
in Christ, not confused but conjoined. Each of them preserves its peculiar
qualities.
2 The
divine spirit mingles God and man in Christ.
3 The Word governs Christ’s
humanity.
4 Christ’s humanity was genuine and
complete, including soul and body.
5 Christ’s humanity can suffer and
die. Christ’s divinity cannot suffer and die.
6 After resurrection, Jesus preserve the substance and
form of human flesh in heaven. |
4 |
|
Arians
(Alexandria)
non-orthodox |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
1 A “Word-Flesh” type of Christology--incomplete
humanity
(The
Word is not fully divine, is a creature, and is changeable.)
2 God became flesh, not became a
man.
3 One nature, divine nature, in
Christ.
4 Christ was not a complete man,
lacking a human soul. |
4 |
Athanasius |
(Alexandria)
orthodox
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
1 A “Word-Flesh” type of Christology
(The
Word is fully divine, and is unchangeable in Christ)
2 The Word became flesh
3 One and same Person.
4 The Word governs Christ’s humanity |
4 |
Eustathius
|
(Antiochene) |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
1 A “Word-man” type of Christology--complete
humanity
2 God became a man
3 Two nature in Christ
4 The Word dwell in humanity |
4 |
Apollinarius |
Apollinari-
anism
(Alexandria)
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
1 A “Word-Flesh” type of
Christology. Monophysite,
2 Christ was God’s incarnation.
God’s spirit united with fresh in one nature.
3 There is one nature, the divine nature in Christ.
Christ is a single, undivided Person.
4 This one nature composed of
impassible divinity and passible flesh.
5 There is no human nature in
Christ.
6 Christ did not have human mind or soul so that
there were not two contradictory wills in Christ
7 The Word is fully divine is unchangeable in Christ so
that there were no sin in Christ
*This theory was condemned as heresy
because:
1. Docetism: Christ
is not a complete human
2. If Christ was not a complete
human, He could not save humans |
4-5 |
Diodore of Tarsus |
(Antiochene)
Nestorian |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
1 If the Word unites with the fresh, the divinity will be
compromised by humanity.
2 Therefore, he opposes the unity of
divinity and humanity.
3 Two natures and two Persons in
Christ. They do not mix or conjoin.
4 distinguishes the Son of God and
the son of David--the theory of Two Sons
* the theory of Two Sons =
Nestorianism |
4-5 |
Theodore
and
Nestorius |
(Antiochene) |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 A “Word-man” type of Christology
2 The perfect unity of two natures
as one Person or one hypostasis in Christ
3 Two nature is united, but not mixed. Each natures is
complete and independent.
*
Nestorius was
not
a Nestorian (Kelly, Ch12, Sec.2, p316) |
4-5 |
Cyril |
(Alexandria) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 The Word joins spirit, soul and
flesh together in Christ.
2 The divinity unites to the whole of humanity, called
the hypostatic union in Christ.
3 Divinity and humanity united in
one nature and one hypostasis
4 Two natures are united closely in Christ. Hence, two
natures cannot be distinguished in the union. Each nature is not
independent. However, they also cannot be confused or mixed.
5 Christ is simultaneously God and
man. |
5 |
First Council of Ephesus
(431) |
(Antiochene) |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
1 Two natures in Christ. His divinity is
consubstantial with the Father. His humanity is consubstantial with us.
2 Christ is a complete God and complete man composed of a
rational soul and a body.
3 Two natures are unite in
one Person, but are not mixed. |
5 |
Council of Chalcadon (451) |
(Antiochene) |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 Christ is One and is both human
and divine
2 His divinity is consubstantial with the Father. His
humanity is consubstantial with us.
3 Two natures in one person and
hypostasis
4 the two natures are united without confusion, without
change, without division, and without separation
5
Chalcedonian decree as a principle of Christology |
Two main
contrasting Approaches of Christology
Alexandria-heresy: Arians,
Apollinarianism |
Antiochene-heresy: Diodore,
Nestorian |
1 “Word-Flesh” type
1 one nature, divine nature
2 incomplete humanity in Christ.
3 Christ did not have human mind or
soul |
1 Two natures and two Persons in
Christ.
2 They do not mix or conjoin.
3 distinguishes the Son of God and the son of David--the
theory of Two Sons |
Alexandria: Cyril |
Antiochene:
Theodore
|
1 The Word joins spirit, soul and
flesh together in Christ.
2 The divinity unites to the whole of humanity, called
the hypostatic union in Christ.
3 Divinity and humanity united in
one nature and one hypostasis
4 Two natures are united closely. Hence, two natures
cannot be distinguished in the union. Each nature is not
independent. However, they also cannot be confused or mixed.
5 Christ is simultaneously God and
man.
|
1 “Word-man” type
2 two natures, divine nature and
human nature
3 complete humanity in Christ.
Christ has human mind and soul
4 Two natures are united, but not mixed. Hence, two
natures can be distinguished in the union. Each nature is complete and
independent. |
Second Council of Ephesus
(449) Robber Synod or Brigandage |
First Council of Ephesus
(431) Formula of Christology |
The case of Eutyches
One nature
in Christ
Monophysite |
1 Two natures in Christ. His divinity is
consubstantial with the Father. His humanity is consubstantial with us.
2 Christ is a complete God and complete man composed of a
rational soul and a body.
3 Two natures are unite in
one Person, but are not mixed.
|
|
Council of Chalcedon (451) |
|
1 Christ is One and is both human
and divine
2 His divinity is consubstantial with the Father. His
humanity is consubstantial with us.
3 Two natures in one person and
hypostasis
4 the two natures are united without confusion, without
change, without division, and without separation
5 Chalcedonian decree as a
principle of Christology |
Bibliography
Kelly, J.N.D., Early Christian
Doctrines, (NY: Continuum, 1977)
Ferguson, S. B. & Wright, D. F.,
(editors), New Dictionary of Theology, (London: Leicester, IVP, 1988)
|